Supreme Court of Colorado· 4/12/1999

Brooks v. People

Citations

975 P.2d 1105
1999 WL 86676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that under CRE 702, evidence that is reasonably reliable and that will assist the trier of fact should be admitted
holding that evidence is admissible if it is reasonably reliable and will assist the trier of fact
holding that a drug-sniffing dog is not technology of the type addressed in Kyllo v. United States meriting a divergence from the extensive national and federal case law developed regarding vehicle dog sniffs
holding that a drug-sniffing dog is not technology of the type addressed in Kyllo v. United States meriting a divergence from the extensive national and federal case law developed regarding vehicle dog sniffs
holding that canine scent-tracking evidence does not constitute evidence subject to Daubert scientific validation factors but that conventional Rule 702 and Rule 403 analysis should be applied
holding that canine scent-tracking evidence does not constitute evidence subject to Daubert scientific validation factors but that conventional Rule 702 and Rule 403 analysis should be applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martinez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Brooks v. People

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.