Skip to main content

Foster v. State

Citations

  • 679 So. 2d 747
  • 1996 WL 399853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant planned to recoup gambling losses and all crimes discussed at trial were part of that scheme
  • evidence of prior attempted robbery admissible to show the motive and intent of the defendants
  • \These robberies were all committed in an attempt to recoup Booker's [accomplice] gambling losses.\
  • “As long as the court considered all of the evidence, a trial judge’s determination of lack of mitigation will stand absent a palpable abuse of discretion.”
  • “It is clear from the sentencing order that the trial court gave some weight to non-statutory mitigation; however, the trial court did not find that it rose to the level of this statutory mitigator. Accordingly, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.