Supreme Court of Florida· 12/2/2004

Huggins v. State

Citations

889 So. 2d 743
2004 WL 2755802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that Savino \rejected the argument that the standard of similarity should be less strict when similar-fact evidence is offered by the defendant\
providing that a defendant who succeeds in getting his exculpatory statements into evidence risks having those statements impeached through felony convictions
concluding there was competent, substantial evidence to support a trial court’s finding of the pecuniary gain aggravator when the defendant stole the victim’s car and jewelry
affirming trial court's admission of testimony regarding the victim's plans on the day of her murder
finding the appellant “opened the door to his own impeachment” where defense counsel “indirectly elicited” appellant’s exculpatory statement “by including it as an implied assumption” in question posed to witness
recognizing exceptions to the state-of-mind rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.