Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/6/2002

Glover v. State

Citations

792 A.2d 1160
368 Md. 211
2002 Md. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a postponement as a result of the unavailability of DNA evidence was “both neutral and justified” where there was “no evidence that the State failed to act in a diligent manner”
explaining that this Court has “employed the proposition that a pre-trial delay greater than one year and fourteen days was ‘presumptively prejudicial’”
reviewing de novo the lower court's judgment on a motion to dismiss for violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial
reviewing de novo the lower court’s judgment on a motion to dismiss for violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial
reviewing de novo the judgment of the trial court on a motion to dismiss for violation of the right to a speedy trial
applying de novo review to a question of the constitutional right to a speedy trial but stating that the trial court’s findings of fact are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia, Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.