Skip to main content

Jules v. State

Citations

  • 910 A.2d 553
  • 171 Md. App. 458
  • 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Curley analysis is inappropriate in a denial of a motion to amend case because there is no ruling by the trial court controlling the court’s calendar which the State may seek to circumvent
  • noting that the Curley analysis is inappropriate in a denial of a motion to amend case because there is no ruling by the trial court controlling the court's calendar which the State may seek to circumvent
  • sixteen-month delay triggered Barker review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Salmon, Eyler, James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.