Skip to main content

Nottingham v. State

Citations

  • 227 Md. App. 592
  • 135 A.3d 541
  • 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an appellate court may “affirm a judgment on any ground apparent from the record”
  • stating that an appellate court may “affirm a judgment on any ground apparent from the record”
  • affirming conviction of misdemeanor manslaughter because the jury had found the defendant guilty of three separate predicate offenses, and only one of the predicate convictions was affected by the instructional error
  • “[U]nlike assault and battery,” affray is “not a crime against the person; rather, affray is a crime against the public” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[U]nlike assault and battery,” affray is “not a crime against the person; rather, affray is a crime against the public” (internal quotation 24 UNITED STATES v. RAHIMI THOMAS, J., dissenting marks omitted)
  • “[U]nlike assault and battery,” affray is “not a crime against the person; rather, affray is a crime against the public” (internal quotation 24 UNITED STATES v. RAHIMI THOMAS, J., dissenting marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zarnoch, Leahy, Sharer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.