Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/6/1975
Epps v. State
Citations
- 345 A.2d 62
- 276 Md. 96
- 1975 Md. LEXIS 715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the accused’s right to a speedy trial pursuant to federal and state constitutional law principles
- referring to the State’s decision to try defendants together as a “tactical decision”
- delay of one year and fourteen days was \sufficiently inordinate to constitute a `triggering mechanism' to engage in the `sensitive balancing process'\
- delay of one year and fourteen days was “sufficiently inordinate to constitute a ‘triggering mechanism’ to engage in the ‘sensitive balancing process’ ”
- A robbery case where a delay of one year and fourteen days was “sufficiently inordinate to constitute a ‘triggering mechanism.’ ”
- delay of one year and fourteen days was \presumptively prejudicial\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- State v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-23· cited 62×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-14· cited 60×
- Erbe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-07· cited 56×
- Brady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-14· cited 50×
- People v. ForrestMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-11-09· cited 42×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-07· cited 42×
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-23· cited 41×
- Glover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-03-06· cited 41×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-24· cited 39×
- Marks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-05· cited 31×
- Divver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-15· cited 31×
- Howell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-05-02· cited 27×
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-17· cited 26×
- Mraz v. COUNTY COMM'RS OF CECIL CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-08-24· cited 22×
- Borgen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-08· cited 21×
- Brady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-23· cited 19×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-11-09· cited 18×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-03-08· cited 17×
- Flores v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-03-03· cited 16×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1967-03-13· cited 1,817×
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 1,196×
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court· 1969-01-20· cited 1,132×
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-05-25· cited 824×
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 744×
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 675×
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 594×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 429×
- United States v. Ralph F. DeleoFirst Circuit· 1970-04-20· cited 199×
- Ollie Melvin Hodges v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1969-03-11· cited 128×
- Isaiah Hedgepeth, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1966-06-30· cited 109×
- United States v. Carl Eugene Detienne and Charles Henry AskinsSeventh Circuit· 1973-01-22· cited 80×
- United States v. Thomas W. BishtonD.C. Circuit· 1972-04-17· cited 73×
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-07· cited 71×
- United States v. Patrick Vincent ButlerFirst Circuit· 1970-06-03· cited 63×
- State v. LawlessCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-10-21· cited 54×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-03-08· cited 45×
- United States v. Lee W. MerrickTenth Circuit· 1972-08-25· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.