Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 682 A.2d 248
  • 343 Md. 448
  • 1996 Md. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Involving a probable cause issue the Court stated “it is the trier of fact that must draw the inferences.... Consequently, absent clear error in its fact-finding, an appellate court is required, in deference to the trial court, to accept those findings of fact.”
  • Involving a probable cause issue the Court stated “it is the trier of fact that must draw the inferences.... Consequently, absent clear error in its fact-finding, an appellate court is required, in deference to the trial court, to accept those findings of fact.”
  • “it’s not just a question of being an expert and coming in and saying the magic words”
  • “it’s not just a question of being an expert and coming in and saying the magic words”
  • \it's not just a question of being an expert and coming in and saying the magic words\
  • “[Aflosent clear error in its fact-finding, an appellate court is required, in deference to the trial court, to accept those findings of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.