Skip to main content

White v. State

Citations

  • 223 Md. App. 353
  • 116 A.3d 520
  • 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the power to decide an unpreserved issue is solely within the appellate court’s discretion
  • noting the benefit of “rigorous adversarial testing that is the norm of Anglo-American criminal proceedings”
  • noting the benefit of “rigorous adversarial testing that is the norm of Anglo-American criminal proceedings”
  • “Accordingly, we hold that the Craig standard applies when the State seeks to present witness testimony via two-way video conference against a defendant in a criminal proceeding.”
  • applying Craig to allow a witness in a cold case to testify by two-way video because it would be “cruel and unnecessary to require her to fly” given her health concerns
  • applying Craig to allow a witness in a cold case to testify by two-way video because it would be 'cruel and 10 CR-21-0361 unnecessary to require her to fly' given her health concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meredith, Graeff, Leahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.