Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/22/1978

Stewart v. State

Citations

386 A.2d 1206
282 Md. 557
1978 Md. LEXIS 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an order denying a challenge to an array cannot be converted into an appealable order simply because it is joined with an appeal of an interlocutory order that is appealable
holding that an order denying a challenge to an array cannot be converted into an appealable order simply because it is joined with an appeal of an interlocutory order that is appealable
recognizing and applying the collateral order doctrine articulated in Cohen
stating “there [is] no substantive difference between 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the Maryland statute.”
applying MacDonald to hold that no immediate appeal will lie from an order denying a Maryland defendant’s motion to dismiss for a speedy trial violation, under either the federal Constitution or Article 21 of the Maryland Constitution
no substantive difference between 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and CJ 12-301

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth and Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.