State v. Rojo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellate court will not search the record for 3 evidence of preservation when the defendant did not provide adequate transcript 4 references
• holding that the fact finder is free to reject 6 a party’s version of events
• holding that contrary evidence does not warrant 4 reversal because the jury is free to reject a party’s version of events
• holding that appellate courts will not search the record to find whether 18 an issue was preserved where the defendant did not refer the court to appropriate 19 transcript references
• holding that appellate courts will not 3 search the record to find whether an issue was preserved where the defendant did not 4 refer the court to appropriate transcript references
• stating that an appellate court will not search the record to find whether an issue was preserved where the defendant does not refer the court to appropriate transcript references

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).