Nevada Supreme Court· 3/13/2000
Gaines v. State
Citations
- 998 P.2d 166
- 1 Nev. 359
- 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 39
- 2000 Nev. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that an equal- protection analysis depends on the level of scrutiny to be applied, and unless the case involves fundamental rights or a suspect class, the government's actions will likely be upheld if there is a rational basis for them
- “The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment mandates that all persons similarly situated receive like treatment under the law”
- seeming to equate narrow tailoring with strict necessity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maupin, Shearing, Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lader v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional CenterNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-06· cited 362×
- Segundo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-12-10· cited 348×
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeNinth Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 244×
- People v. GarvinIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-03-23· cited 151×
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-03-07· cited 115×
- State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-21· cited 90×
- State v. ScarboroughTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-08-28· cited 89×
- State v. McKinneyNebraska Court of Appeals· 2007-04-13· cited 85×
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 52×
- State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-26· cited 50×
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeNinth Circuit· 2003-10-02· cited 40×
- In re D.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-18· cited 39×
- People v. ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-11-17· cited 37×
- L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-17· cited 31×
- Tarango v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court· 2001-06-13· cited 30×
- Miller v. United States Parole Comm'nD. Kansas· 2003-04-15· cited 29×
- Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical ExaminersNevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-19· cited 26×
- Schreiber v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 2003-07-16· cited 25×
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 25×
- Polston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-01-20· cited 23×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court· 1986-03-04· cited 6,155×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 760×
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 733×
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 667×
- Jones v. MurrayFourth Circuit· 1992-04-07· cited 239×
- Rise v. OregonNinth Circuit· 1995-07-18· cited 129×
- State v. OlivasWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 98×
- Boling v. RomerTenth Circuit· 1996-12-02· cited 95×
- Roe v. MarcotteSecond Circuit· 1999-09-16· cited 86×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. OrozcoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-20· cited 51×
- Building & Construction Trades Council of Northern Nevada v. State Ex Rel. Public Works BoardNevada Supreme Court· 1992-08-20· cited 51×
- People v. WealerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-29· cited 48×
- Cooper v. GammonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 46×
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action Nos. JV-512600 and JV-512797Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-07-23· cited 44×
- Vanderlinden v. State of Kan.D. Kansas· 1995-01-24· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.