· 10/6/2005
Lader v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional Center
Citations
- 120 P.3d 1164
- 121 Nev. 682
- 121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 69
- 2005 Nev. LEXIS 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that we give deference to the district court's factual findings when reviewing its resolution of a postconviction petition but review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo
- explaining that we give deference to the district court's factual findings but review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo
- giving deference to the district court's factual findings but reviewing its legal conclusions de novo
- using similar reasoning for review of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
- deferring to the district court's factual findings that are supported by substantial evidence and not clearly wrong, but reviewing its application of the law to those facts de novo
- deferring to the district court’s factual findings that are supported by substantial 8 evidence and not clearly wrong, but reviewing its application of the law to those facts de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Gibbons, Hardesty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.