Schreiber v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding imposition of discipline for refusal to supply blood specimen did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause
• holding statute requiring inmates to submit blood specimens for DNA profiling did not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws
• holding imposition of discipline for refusal to supply blood specimen did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause
• holding statute requiring inmates to submit blood specimens for DNA profiling did not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws
• concluding provision did not amount to ex post facto punishment
• noting an issue could be deemed waived when the petitioners “allude to [the issue] in one sentence in 7 their appellate brief” and “do not present an argument on the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).