· 6/13/1988
Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard
Citations
- 486 U.S. 517
- 108 S. Ct. 1945
- 100 L. Ed. 2d 517
- 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2587
- 56 U.S.L.W. 4545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a forum non conveniens motion “may be resolved on affidavits submitted by the parties”
- conclusion to deny collateral order appeal \fortified by the availability of interlocutory review\ under Sec. 1292(b)
- “Service of process merely requires that a defendant appear through an attorney and file an answer to the complaint to avoid default.”
- “An order granting default judgment without any judgment entry on the issue of damages is no more than an interlocutory order . . . .”
- immediate review of issues enmeshed in merits would waste judicial resources
- “[A]n unauthorized intentional deprivation of property by a state 18 employee does not constitute a violation of the procedural requirements of the Due Process 19 Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment if a meaningful postdeprivation remedy for the loss is 20 available.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.