Miller v. United States Parole Comm'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The intrusion of a DNA test is minimal. As discussed above, Plaintiffs privacy interest in his identity is severely diminished both by his status as a convicted felon as well as his status as a parolee”
• DNA testing “is a precise technological method of identifying *** potential suspects” and “is more conclusive [than traditional methods of identification such as photographing and fingerprinting; it] ‘can practically guarantee a 100% certain identity’ ”
• DNA testing \is a precise technological method of identifying *** potential suspects\ and \is more conclusive [than traditional methods of identification such as photographing and fingerprinting; it] 'can practically guarantee a 100% certain identity' \
• upholding a federal DNA collection statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).