Nebraska Court of Appeals· 4/13/2007
State v. McKinney
Citations
- 273 Neb. 346
- 730 N.W.2d 74
- 2007 Neb. LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that government interest in taking DNA from person convicted of misdemeanor forgery “without individualized probable cause” did not outweigh misde-meanant’s privacy interest
- applying the analysis in Bartlett in upholding the denial of the defendant’s motion to obtain DNA samples from witnesses
- applying the analysis in Bartlett in upholding the denial of the defendant’s motion to obtain DNA samples from witnesses
- “DNA databasing statutes do not allow law enforcement to single out any particular offender”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Hannon, Heavican
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
- State v. ArchieNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-05-25· cited 199×
- State v. GalindoNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-10-09· cited 186×
- State of Tennessee v. Jessie DotsonTennessee Supreme Court· 2014-09-30· cited 179×
- State v. BormannNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-01-29· cited 109×
- Kuhn v. WELLS FARGO BANK OF NEBRASKANebraska Supreme Court· 2009-08-28· cited 73×
- State v. BarrancoNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-07-24· cited 64×
- In Re Interest of Tyler F.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-09-05· cited 55×
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-05-28· cited 55×
- State v. JimNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-04-18· cited 53×
- State v. AlfordNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-11-06· cited 48×
- State v. McKinneyNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-01-22· cited 41×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-01-25· cited 37×
- State v. VasquezNebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-02-12· cited 29×
- In Re Interest of CHNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-04-10· cited 25×
- State v. RoyerNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-07-18· cited 23×
- United States v. DavisD. Maryland· 2009-09-15· cited 19×
- State v. BossowNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-01-18· cited 18×
- State v. MontoyaNebraska Supreme Court· 2019-09-27· cited 15×
- In re William R. Zutavern Revocable TrustNebraska Supreme Court· 2021-06-25· cited 12×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 1,478×
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 1,412×
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 963×
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 739×
- Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. EarlsSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 498×
- State v. BjorklundNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-02-25· cited 265×
- Nicholas v. GoordSecond Circuit· 2005-11-28· cited 223×
- State v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-06-09· cited 177×
- United States v. W.J.B. Axsom, IIEighth Circuit· 2002-05-06· cited 136×
- State v. IromuanyaNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-08-11· cited 131×
- Norman C. Green, Jr., Donald Lee, Glenn Turner, and Dennis E. Jones-El v. Gerald A. Berge and James E. Doyle, Attorney GeneralSeventh Circuit· 2004-01-09· cited 126×
- Commonwealth v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-12-29· cited 126×
- United States v. Paul G. SczubelekThird Circuit· 2005-03-21· cited 125×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-09-05· cited 121×
- State v. MarrsNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-11-09· cited 119×
- State v. VoichahoskeNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-02-10· cited 109×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.