Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/31/2003
State v. Martinez
Citations
- 78 P.3d 769
- 276 Kan. 527
- 2003 Kan. LEXIS 582
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- with this information, \there is no immediate possibility of finding probable cause to support an arrest\ and thus, does not detect ordinary criminal wrongdoing
- with this information, \there is no immediate possibility of finding probable cause to support an arrest\ and thus, does not detect ordinary criminal wrongdoing
- with this information, “there is no immediate possibility of finding probable cause to support an arrest” and thus, does not detect ordinary criminal wrongdoing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gernon, Abbott, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-11-10· cited 629×
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeNinth Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 244×
- State v. ScarboroughTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-08-28· cited 89×
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-01-30· cited 71×
- People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-03· cited 52×
- State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-26· cited 50×
- Polston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-01-20· cited 23×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-05-02· cited 21×
- State v. O'HAGENNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-09-07· cited 9×
- State ex rel. L.R.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-01-30· cited 5×
- People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-10-21· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Mack T. TransouCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-05-13
- State Ex Rel. LrNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-01-30
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,072×
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 523×
- United States v. KimlerTenth Circuit· 2003-07-07· cited 253×
- Jones v. MurrayFourth Circuit· 1992-04-07· cited 239×
- Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1963-11-18· cited 148×
- Inmate 115235, C.A. Kruger v. Robert EricksonEighth Circuit· 1996-02-28· cited 140×
- Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2000-04-21· cited 138×
- Rise v. OregonNinth Circuit· 1995-07-18· cited 129×
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-03-07· cited 115×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.