Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court should review the agency decision to determine whether substantial evidence exists to have convinced the agency that violations had been shown in accord with the standard of proof set out in the statute(s) being enforced
• stating that the Nevada rule of civil procedure “provides guidance for the recovery of costs, regardless of whether the parties are in district court or before an administrative board”
• observing that a district court has discretion to award more than $1,500 for an expert's witness fees
• observing that a district court has discretion to award more than $1,500 for an expert witness's fees
• observing that a district court has discretion to award more than $1,500 for an expert witness's fees
• observing that a district court has discretion to award more than $1,500 for an expert witness's fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).