Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 4/13/2004

Filtration Development Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 60 Fed. Cl. 371
  • 2004 WL 905324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an organizational conflict of interest
  • holding that the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an OCI
  • holding that the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an OCI
  • noting that the urgency justification cannot support more than the minimum quantity and time needed to satisfy immediate urgent requirements
  • holding the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an OCI
  • finding that the identification of the OCI did not occur as early in the acquisition process as possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Futey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.