Skip to main content
· 5/22/2013

Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 111 Fed. Cl. 49
  • 2013 WL 2300330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that agency decision can be set aside for “‘offer[ing] an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency’”
  • agency’s unexplained reversal of a prequalification decision without supporting documentation caused the 19 court to reject the presumption of good faith and demand proof
  • “[A]ny harm caused to the [agency] by granting a permanent injunction regarding [awardee’s] performance of the [] contract is the result of defendant’s conduct during the procurement.”
  • “GAO decisions, however, are not binding on this court.”
  • “GAO decisions, however, are not binding on this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.