Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the trial court must determine whether the movant is likely to succeed on the merits
• noting that none of the four factors is dis-positive; the district court must weigh each and consider the form and severity of the relief requested
• emphasizing that the trial court must determine whether the movant is likely to succeed on the merits
• determining that irreparable harm is established where there is no “meaningful relief that can be applied retroactively[.]”
• stating that “[n]owhere in Zenith does it suggest that the harm suffered by FMC entitles FMC to an injunction absent a showing of likelihood of success on the merits.”
• stating that “[t]he absence of an adequate showing with regard to any one factor may be sufficient, given the weight or lack of it assigned the other factors, to justify the denial” of a preliminary injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).