Victoria M. Voge v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the military’s exercise of discretion is nonjusticiable, even if the court has Tucker Act jurisdiction
• holding that the military’s exercise of discretion is nonjusticiable, even if the Court has Tucker Act jurisdiction
• holding that “routine personnel decisions” are “variously held nonjusticiable or beyond the competence or the jurisdiction of courts to wrestle with.”
• explaining that “government officials must follow their own regulations, even if they were not compelled to have them at all....”
• explaining that “government officials must follow their own regulations, even if they were not compelled to have them at all ----”
• noting that the inquiry must be one which the court can “soundly administer within [its] special field of competence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).