Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/6/1953

Orloff v. Willoughby

Citations

  • 345 U.S. 83
  • 73 S. Ct. 534
  • 97 L. Ed. 2d 842
  • 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that commissioning of officers in the Army was a matter of discretion within the province of the President
  • holding that assignment decisions in the military are “not within the power” of courts to review
  • holding that, although the government conceded an issue, “such a concession does not necessarily end our inquiry”
  • holding that fitness determinations are within the discretion of the military
  • stating that the Army’s decision not to award commission to, or alternatively to discharge, a medical specialist is not renewable
  • holding discrimination claim by officer against military to be nonjusticiable because denial of commission was properly within military discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson, Black, Frankfurter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

773 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Orloff v. Willoughby

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.