Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “summary judgment in favor of either party is not appropriate if disputes remain as to material facts.”
• explaining that the burden is on the contractor to “carve out” any reservations
• finding that “mere denials or conclusory statements are not sufficient”
• “[T]he party opposing summary judgment must show an evidentiary conflict on the record; mere denials or conclu-sory statements are not sufficient.”
• “the party opposing summary judgment must show an evidentiary conflict on the record; mere denials or conclusory statements are not sufficient”
• party opposing summary judgment must show an evidentiary conflict on record; mere denials or conclusory statements are insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).