Skip to main content
· 12/10/1984

H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United States

Citations

  • 749 F.2d 1571
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that Plaintiff must show “that the officer whose conduct is relied upon had actual authority to bind the government in contract.”
  • providing that in a motion for summary judgment, all favorable inferences go to the nonmov-ing party
  • holding the nonmoving party “receive[s] the benefit of all applicable presumptions, inferences, and intendments”
  • stating that the nonmoving party receives the benefit of all inferences
  • to recover for breach of contract against Government, plaintiff must show \that the officer whose conduct is relied upon had actual authority to bind the government in contract\
  • “The irrigation districts, which contracted with the Bureau, act as a surrogate for the aggregation of farmers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Nichols, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.