· 12/10/1984
H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United States
Citations
- 749 F.2d 1571
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that Plaintiff must show “that the officer whose conduct is relied upon had actual authority to bind the government in contract.”
- providing that in a motion for summary judgment, all favorable inferences go to the nonmov-ing party
- holding the nonmoving party “receive[s] the benefit of all applicable presumptions, inferences, and intendments”
- stating that the nonmoving party receives the benefit of all inferences
- to recover for breach of contract against Government, plaintiff must show \that the officer whose conduct is relied upon had actual authority to bind the government in contract\
- “The irrigation districts, which contracted with the Bureau, act as a surrogate for the aggregation of farmers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Markey, Nichols, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.