One Largo Metro, Llc v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the evaluation of proposals for their technical excellence or quality is a process that often requires the special expertise of procurement officials”
• observing that “the evaluation of proposals for their technical excellence or quality is a process that often requires the special expertise of procurement officials, and thus reviewing courts give the greatest deference possible to these determinations”
• observing that “the evaluation of proposals for their technical excellence or quality is a process that often requires the special expertise of procurement officials, and thus reviewing courts give the greatest deference possible to these determinations”
• stating that because a best value determination “involves layers of decision-making and judgment calls regarding which proposals offer the overall highest technical merit, and what technical advantages are worth a higher price[,] [t]he court is reluctant to second guess” this determination
• “To be well-documented, the source selection decision must contain more than conclusory and generalized statements.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).