District of Columbia· 6/19/2009
Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
Citations
- 626 F. Supp. 2d 55
- 186 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3137
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51878
- 2009 WL 1707610
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the requirement of mistaken identity was not met where the plaintiff was obviously aware of the identity of the party at the time the original complaint was filed, as illustrated by multiple references to the entity in the original complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John D. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peart v. Latham and Watkins LLPDistrict of Columbia· 2013-10-23· cited 23×
- Hubert PHILOGENE, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Et Al., DefendantsDistrict of Columbia· 2012-05-25· cited 15×
- American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2741 v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2009-10-26· cited 10×
- Turner v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-31· cited 1×
- Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionDistrict of Columbia· 2010-06-03
- Jackson v. Starbucks CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2021-04-08
- Cromwell v. International Union, The United SteelworkersVirgin Islands· 2009-08-10
- Carter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2023-07-07
- McNeil v. DuncanDistrict of Columbia· 2024-10-08
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 3,153×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 1,335×
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorD.C. Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 985×
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 573×
- Richardson, Roy Dale v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1999-10-22· cited 497×
- Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityD.C. Circuit· 1997-05-16· cited 327×
- Ronald T. Phillips v. Bureau of PrisonsD.C. Circuit· 1979-01-15· cited 275×
- William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the ArmyD.C. Circuit· 1988-04-26· cited 258×
- Margot Rendall-Speranza v. Edward A. NassimD.C. Circuit· 1997-03-14· cited 169×
Other cases named Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.