Margot Rendall-Speranza v. Edward A. Nassim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim was subject to a one-year statute of limitations because “[e]very incident that, [the plaintiff] allege[d], contributed to her emotional distress involved an assault and battery”
• allowing pendent review if such review will terminate the entire case, sparing both the appellate and district courts from further proceedings and giving the parties a speedy resolution
• exercising pendent appellate jurisdiction pursuant to an interlocutory appeal of the denial of sovereign immunity under the FSIA
• allowing interlocutory appeal based on for- eign sovereign immunity claim, but declining to decide im- munity issue, which was both difficult and implicated foreign relations
• allowing interlocutory appeal based on for- eign sovereign immunity claim, but declining to decide im- munity issue, which was both difficult and implicated foreign relations
• explaining right of repose arises where defendant did not know it would need to defend against claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).