American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2741 v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n substantive due process cases[,] . . . courts have consistently held that ‘there is no fundamental right to government employment.’” (omission in original) (quoting McManus v. District of Columbia, 530 F. Supp. 2d 46, 71 (D.D.C. 2007)
• “A mere violation of law does not give rise to a due process claim.” (quoting AFGE, AFL-CIO, Local 446 v. Nicholson, 475 F.3d 341, 352 (D.C. Cir. 2007)). Here, because Da’Vage has brought suit directly under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Dkt. 1 at 4 (Compl.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).