Skip to main content
· 10/26/1994

Evraets v. Intermedics Intraocular, Inc.

Citations

  • 29 Cal. App. 4th 779
  • 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 852
  • 29 Cal. App. 2d 779
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8164
  • 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 42
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 15101
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • negligence and strict liability claims preempted; express warranty, fraud, and negligence per se claims not preempted
  • “privity is not a requirement for actions based upon an express warranty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.