· 8/14/2001
Arnold v. Dow Chemical Company
Citations
- 110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 722
- 91 Cal. App. 4th 698
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 8649
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7082
- 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying 3 privity exception to drugs “on the basis that a drug is intended for human consumption quite as 4 much as is food.”
- rejecting application of Papike to preempt design defect consumer expectations claim
- rejecting application of Papike to preempt design defect consumer expectations claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.