Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing an exception where “the purchaser of a product relied 4 on representations made by the manufacturer in labels or advertising material, and recovery 5 from the manufacturer was allowed on the theory of express warranty without a showing 6 of privity”
• “vertical privity is a prerequisite in California for recovery on a breach of implied warranty theory”
• “[T]he ... exception, where representations are made by means of labels or advertisements, is applicable only to express warranties.”
• “[T]he ... exception, where representations are made by means of labels or advertisements, i[s] applicable only to express warranties.”
• crop damage claimed against manufacturer of insecticide spray

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).