Seely v. White Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a manufacturer of a defective product is not subject to strict liability where the damages are purely economic
• concluding that if a defective product causes purely economic harm, tort liability is precluded, in order to preserve the law of warranty
• concluding that if a defective product causes purely economic harm, tort liability is precluded, in order to preserve the law of warranty
• finding that contract and warranty law is better suited to address purely economic losses
• dismissing a CLRA claim based on a manufacturer’s alleged duty to disclose where the omission did not implicate safety concerns
• dismissing a CLRA claim based on a manufacturer's alleged duty to disclose where the omission did not implicate safety concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).