Skip to main content
· 10/29/1996

Armstrong v. Optical Radiation Corp.

Citations

  • 50 Cal. App. 4th 580
  • 57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 763
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 13109
  • 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1084
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7930
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state law requirements imposed by negligence and strict liability theories are “based on general principles of state tort law which were not specifically developed with respect to medical devices”
  • holding that state law requirements imposed by negligence and strict liability theories are \based on general principles of state tort law which were not specifically developed with respect to medical devices\
  • “[I]n approving [the product] through the PMA process, the FDA imposed federal requirements specific to that product which govern virtually every aspect of its production and sale.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Masterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.