Perez v. Nidek Co. Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts have interpreted section 337(a) as prohibiting private rights of action under the FDCA and have dismissed state law claims that seek to enforce the FDCA or its regulations”
• “[F]ederal question jurisdiction is not created by the fact that Plaintiffs' state law claims under the CLRA and UCL hinge upon alleged violations of the FDCA and its regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).