Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal regulations governing the collection of blood plasma from paid donors did not pre-empt local ordinances which imposed additional testing requirements, including hepatitis and blood alcohol tests, upon such donors
• holding that the courts “can expect that [Congress and/or agencies] . . . will make their intentions clear if they intend for their regulations to be ex- clusive”
• recognizing a “presumption that state or local regulation of matters related to health and safety is not invalidated under the Supremacy Clause”
• recognizing a “presumption that state or local regulation of matters related to health and safety is not invalidated under the Supremacy Clause”
• recognizing a \presumption that state or local regulation of matters related to health and safety is not invalidated under the Supremacy Clause\
• noting that the presumption against preemption governs unless preemption “ Vas the clear and manifest purpose of Congress’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).