S.D. California· 7/28/2015
Tapia v. Davol, Inc.
Citations
- 116 F. Supp. 3d 1149
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98521
- 2015 WL 4544507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiff failed to allege their prescribing physician read and relied on express 5 warranties made about the product
- discussing the evolution of the privity requirement in California 24 law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Curiel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentNinth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceNinth Circuit· 2009-07-16· cited 3,161×
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-02-12· cited 1,065×
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1963-01-24· cited 1,019×
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-08· cited 1,018×
- John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1992-02-19· cited 690×
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigNinth Circuit· 1987-06-03· cited 673×
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court· 1965-06-23· cited 667×
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 581×
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-24· cited 382×
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-11-08· cited 301×
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court· 1954-04-16· cited 257×
- United States of America, Exrel., Insoon Lee v. Smithkline Beecham, Inc. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories Does 1-100Ninth Circuit· 2001-04-02· cited 236×
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-31· cited 232×
- Al-Kidd v. AshcroftNinth Circuit· 2009-09-04· cited 209×
- Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-04-28· cited 207×
- Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 198×
- Tarmann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-12-30· cited 188×
Other cases named Tapia v. Davol, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.