Idaho Supreme Court· 11/24/2006
Estrada v. State
Citations
- 149 P.3d 833
- 143 Idaho 558
- 2006 Ida. LEXIS 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant has a right to the advice of counsel regarding the defendant’s participation in a psychosexual evaluation
- Sixth Amendment critical stage analysis raised by neither party but addressed by the Court as precursor to arguments presented
- Sixth Amendment critical stage analysis raised by neither party but addressed by the Court as precursor to arguments presented
- “Incrimination is implicated ... when punishment could be enhanced as a result of the defendant’s statements”
- “Incrimination is implicated . . . when punishment could be enhanced as a result of the defendant’s statements”
- “Incrimination is implicated ... when punishment could be enhanced as a result of the defendant’s statements.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trout, Schroeder, Eismann, Burdick, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-12-15· cited 235×
- State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-08-27· cited 191×
- Gonzales v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-04-12· cited 180×
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 106×
- State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-09-13· cited 62×
- State v. JeskeIdaho Supreme Court· 2019-03-08· cited 62×
- Kriebel v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-09-04· cited 49×
- State v. MolenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-01-12· cited 39×
- Hughes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-10-14· cited 37×
- Woodrow Grant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-04-25· cited 35×
- Thumm v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2019-08-22· cited 31×
- Jeffrey Dane Murray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-03-19· cited 29×
- Marsalis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-02-18· cited 20×
- State v. PetersonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-01-07· cited 19×
- John David Wurdemann v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2017-02-28· cited 19×
- State v. James Greer DalyIdaho Supreme Court· 2017-04-12· cited 19×
- Sarah M. Johnson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-02-18· cited 16×
- State v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court· 2012-01-06· cited 15×
- State v. Faron Raymond HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-12-23· cited 15×
- State v. Marcos Apollo JimenezIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-07-22· cited 12×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,589×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 552×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-07-10· cited 131×
- State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-05-21· cited 122×
- State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-08-24· cited 105×
- Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 64×
- State v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-10-09· cited 60×
- John Lewis Jones v. Harold J. Cardwell, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonNinth Circuit· 1982-09-07· cited 54×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Viken BENLIAN, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1995-08-10· cited 41×
- Pratt v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2000-07-20· cited 41×
- Quinlan v. Idaho Commission for Pardons & ParoleIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-04-29· cited 40×
- State v. RuthIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-11-24· cited 34×
- Mitchell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 32×
- State v. WilkinsIdaho Supreme Court· 1994-02-08· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.