Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 11/24/2006

Estrada v. State

Citations

  • 149 P.3d 833
  • 143 Idaho 558
  • 2006 Ida. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant has a right to the advice of counsel regarding the defendant’s participation in a psychosexual evaluation
  • Sixth Amendment critical stage analysis raised by neither party but addressed by the Court as precursor to arguments presented
  • Sixth Amendment critical stage analysis raised by neither party but addressed by the Court as precursor to arguments presented
  • “Incrimination is implicated ... when punishment could be enhanced as a result of the defendant’s statements”
  • “Incrimination is implicated . . . when punishment could be enhanced as a result of the defendant’s statements”
  • “Incrimination is implicated ... when punishment could be enhanced as a result of the defendant’s statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, Schroeder, Eismann, Burdick, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.