Thumm v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing distinction, for purposes of constitutionality of blocking comments on social media page, between page maintained by candidate seeking office and page maintained by public offi- cial
• “Running for public office is not state action; it is a pri- vate activity.”
• “[Section] 1983 excludes from its reach merely private conduct, in that, for a § 1983 claim to succeed, a defendant must have acted under color of state law.” (cleaned up and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).