State v. Azad Haji Abdullah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding decision of what witnesses to call is an area where we will not second- guess counsel without evidence of inadequate preparation, ignorance of the relevant law, or other shortcomings capable of objective evaluation
• decision of what witnesses to call is area where we will not second-guess counsel without evidence of inadequate preparation, ignorance of relevant law, or other shortcomings capable of objective evaluation
• “Constitutional issues are pure questions of law over which this Court exercises free review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).