Idaho Supreme Court· 6/21/1999
Ray v. State
Citations
- 982 P.2d 931
- 133 Idaho 96
- 1999 Ida. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “registration is a consequence of conviction over which the district judge has no direct control”
- discussing that in a plea agreement, waiver of constitutional rights “will be upheld if the entire record demonstrates the waiver was made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently”
- following “majority view” that registration is a collateral consequence because it is “largely remedial in purpose, not punitive”
- sex offender registration is a collateral consequence of a guilty plea of which the defendant need not be informed
- “[t]he Sixth Amendment contains no implied duty for an attorney to inform his client of collateral consequences of a guilty plea”
- \[t]he Sixth Amendment contains no implied duty for an attorney to inform his client of collateral consequences of a guilty plea\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trout, Well, Walters, Silak, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-05-11· cited 838×
- Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-17· cited 398×
- Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 2010-07-07· cited 195×
- State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court· 2000-02-04· cited 125×
- Estrada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2006-11-24· cited 109×
- Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-04· cited 77×
- Kellar v. Fayetteville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-12-02· cited 57×
- Kaiser v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-04-18· cited 53×
- Hyatt v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-02-21· cited 51×
- State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 41×
- Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2001-12-04· cited 39×
- State v. FlowersIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 34×
- R.W. v. SandersSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-01-11· cited 33×
- Nollette v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-05-17· cited 31×
- Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-02-10· cited 29×
- State v. HerediaIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-02-15· cited 26×
- State v. HartwigIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-02-02· cited 24×
- Dean v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-08· cited 24×
- People v. MontaineColorado Court of Appeals· 1999-12-23· cited 24×
- State v. JoslinIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-12-24· cited 19×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-25· cited 688×
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 552×
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 303×
- People v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-03-09· cited 272×
- People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 201×
- State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 162×
- State v. ColyerIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-12-14· cited 128×
- State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court· 1992-04-21· cited 116×
- In Re BirchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-10-26· cited 91×
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-07-18· cited 85×
- State v. CarrascoIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-02-09· cited 83×
- State v. MauroIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-12-31· cited 67×
- State v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-10-09· cited 60×
- State v. YoungArizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-10· cited 43×
- Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-09-16· cited 28×
- Brooks v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1985-06-28· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.