Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 5/8/1998

Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co.

Citations

  • 144 F.3d 1182
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 4837
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3492
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9284
  • 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,397
  • 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1450
  • 1998 WL 227469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Congress demonstrated a clear preference \to expand employees' rights and `to increase the possible remedies available to civil rights plaintiffs'\
  • noting that, prior to 1991, Gardner-Denver was widely interpreted as prohibiting any form of compulsory arbitration of Title VII claims
  • noting that Congress demonstrated a clear preference “to expand employees’ rights and ‘to increase the possible remedies available to civil rights plaintiffs’ ”
  • stating that compulsory arbitration did not include the situation where an employee elects, after a dispute has arisen, to submit claim to arbitration, even if the underlying arbitration agreement is not enforceable
  • “[N]either private arbitration nor the judicial act of enforcing it under the FAA constitutes state action.”
  • “[UJnder the Civil Rights Act of 1991, employers may not [through compulsory arbitration agreements] compel individuals to waive their Title VII right to a judicial fornm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Reinhardt, Restani, Trade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.