Skip to main content
· 5/22/2002

Jennifer Kimbrough v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.

Citations

  • 291 F.3d 1307
  • 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 601
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9607
  • 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,181
  • 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1482
  • 23 NDLR 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prima facie case of retaliation is the same under Title VII, the ADEA, and the ADA
  • holding that statutorily protected expression must be supported by objectively reasonable belief in the record
  • holding refus al to sign a compulsory arbitration agreement in 1999 was not protected opposition conduct because reliance on Duffield was not objectively reasonable
  • applying the Title VII standards on opposition and participation activities to claims under the ADEA
  • outlining elements of a prima facie retaliation claim under “either Title VII, the ADEA or the ADA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Fay, Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.