· 5/22/2002
Jennifer Kimbrough v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.
Citations
- 291 F.3d 1307
- 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 601
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9607
- 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,181
- 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1482
- 23 NDLR 161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prima facie case of retaliation is the same under Title VII, the ADEA, and the ADA
- holding that statutorily protected expression must be supported by objectively reasonable belief in the record
- holding refus al to sign a compulsory arbitration agreement in 1999 was not protected opposition conduct because reliance on Duffield was not objectively reasonable
- applying the Title VII standards on opposition and participation activities to claims under the ADEA
- outlining elements of a prima facie retaliation claim under “either Title VII, the ADEA or the ADA”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carnes, Fay, Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.