Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the employer’s “insidious pattern” of seeking to tip the scales in its favor during employment disputes justified a decision to declare the entire agreement unenforceable
• holding that the employer's \insidious pattern\ of seeking to tip the scales in its favor during employment disputes justified a decision to declare the entire agreement unenforceable
• holding that the grant of unilateral-modification rights was unconscionable in part because it rendered the broader agreement illusory
• holding that “an essentially unilateral bar on class- wide arbitration is substantively unconscionable”
• holding that a class arbitration waiver in an employment contract was unconscio- nable
• stating that under California law, substantive unconseionability refers to whether terms of the agreement “are so one-sided as to shock the conscience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).