Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Assuming arguendo that the 4 FAA does not apply, we would assess the validity of the parties’ arbitration agreements 5 under the California Arbitration Act.”
• “the compulsory nature of a predispute 14 arbitration agreement does not render the agreement unenforceable on grounds of coercion 15 or for lack of voluntariness.”
• “a compulsory 19 predispute arbitration agreement is not rendered unenforceable just because it is required as a 20 condition of employment or offered on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis.”
• “[A] compulsory predispute 26 arbitration agreement is not rendered unenforceable just because 27 it is required as a condition of employment or offered on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis.”
• “[T]he cases uniformly agree that a compulsory pre-dispute arbitration agreement is not rendered unenforceable just because it is required as a condition of employment or offered on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis.”
• “[T]he cases uniformly 22 agree that a compulsory predispute arbitration agreement is not rendered unenforceable just because 23 it is required as a condition of employment or offered on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).