Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “conspiracy theory of jurisdiction does not itself provide a basis upon which the exercise of personal jurisdiction may rest” but “[r]ather . . . is an extension of the jurisdiction conferred upon a court by the enactment of a [state] long-arm statute” (emphasis added)
• “[M]ere speculation that the nonresident defendants’ are co-conspirators [is] insufficient to meet plaintiffs prima facie burden.”
• “a substantial part of the conspiracy ... was centered in Washington, D.C.”
• involving Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• GOGNAT v. Ellsworth
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-09-17· cited 333×
• FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-06-20· cited 281×
• United States v. Philip Morris Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2000-09-28· cited 186×
• Tara Ann Jungquist v. Sheikh Sultan Bin Khalifa Al Nahyan
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-08-12· cited 184×
• Chenault v. Walker
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-01-12· cited 124×
• Ex Parte McInnis
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2001-11-02· cited 106×
• Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges
  District of Columbia· 2004-02-11· cited 102×
• Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2003-10-10· cited 97×
• GTE New Media Services, Inc. v. Ameritech Corp.
  District of Columbia· 1998-09-28· cited 64×
• Douglas v. Chariots for Hire
  District of Columbia· 2013-01-24· cited 58×
• Novak-Canzeri v. Saud
  District of Columbia· 1994-09-30· cited 57×
• Sadighi v. Daghighfekr
  D. South Carolina· 1999-01-05· cited 56×
• COMSAT Corp. v. Finshipyards S.A.M.
  District of Columbia· 1995-09-15· cited 50×
• First American Corp. v. Al-Nahyan
  District of Columbia· 1996-11-26· cited 45×
• Cellutech, Inc. v. Centennial Cellular Corp.
  District of Columbia· 1994-12-23· cited 42×
• DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.
  District of Columbia· 2002-08-29· cited 39×
• Brunson v. Kalil & Co., Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2005-11-18· cited 35×
• AGS International Services S.A. v. Newmont USA Ltd.
  District of Columbia· 2004-11-16· cited 34×
• General Motors Corp. v. Ignacio Lopez De Arriortua
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-11-26· cited 32×
• FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.
  District of Columbia· 2007-02-06· cited 32×

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-07-13· cited 1,092×
• Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of Interior
  D.C. Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 490×
• First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.
  First Circuit· 1988-01-19· cited 397×
• Pain v. United Technologies Corp.
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-11-17· cited 287×
• Antonelli v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 198×
• John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel
  D.C. Circuit· 1992-02-11· cited 189×
• Kent B. Crane v. Archie Carr, III
  D.C. Circuit· 1987-03-27· cited 163×
• Mouzavires v. Baxter
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-08-05· cited 152×
• Martin John Beattie v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-12-31· cited 112×
• Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida Johns
  D.C. Circuit· 1973-06-15· cited 101×
• Rose v. Silver
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-10-30· cited 89×
• Mandelkorn v. Patrick
  District of Columbia· 1973-05-08· cited 70×
• Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v. Charles Schmitt & Co.
  S.D. New York· 1987-04-03· cited 62×
• Soltex Polymer Corp. v. Fortex Industries, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1984-06-20· cited 39×
• Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1985-09-12· cited 29×
• Roger Fandel v. Arabian American Oil Company, a Corporation
  D.C. Circuit· 1965-02-25· cited 26×
• Richard T. Dorman v. Richard L. Thornburgh
  D.C. Circuit· 1992-02-07· cited 23×

Other cases named Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.
  District of Columbia· 1992-10-01· cited 12×
• Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.
  District of Columbia· 1993-05-11· cited 12×