Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “conspiracy theory of jurisdiction does not itself provide a basis upon which the exercise of personal jurisdiction may rest” but “[r]ather . . . is an extension of the jurisdiction conferred upon a court by the enactment of a [state] long-arm statute” (emphasis added)
• “[M]ere speculation that the nonresident defendants’ are co-conspirators [is] insufficient to meet plaintiffs prima facie burden.”
• “a substantial part of the conspiracy ... was centered in Washington, D.C.”
• involving Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).