Kent B. Crane v. Archie Carr, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “transacting business” clause is “coextensive . . . with the Constitution’s due process limit”
• holding that the “transacting business” clause is “coextensive . . . with the Constitution’s due process limit”
• stating that defamation claims “are the kind in which the injury, foreseeably, is felt with greatest force in the place where the plaintiff lives”
• stating that the “transacting business” clause is “coextensive . . . with the Constitution’s due process limit”
• finding that a libelous letter authored in and sent from New York “was not an act in the District” (emphasis in original)
• finding that claims like “libel and ‘false light,’ are the kind in which the injury, foreseeably, is felt with greatest force in the place where the plaintiff lives.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).