Skip to main content
· 1/19/1988

First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.

Citations

  • 836 F.2d 1375
  • 267 U.S. App. D.C. 27
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 584
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 490
  • 1988 WL 2515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that long-arm statute's \transacting business\ provision \has been interpreted to be coextensive with the Constitution's due process limit\
  • “[i]t is settled that a plaintiff must allege specific acts connecting [the] defendant with the forum”
  • “Conclusory statements ... do not constitute the prima facie showing necessary to carry the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction”
  • “Conelusory statements ... do not constitute the prima facie showing necessary to carry the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction.”
  • \Conclusory statements ... [do] not constitute the prima facie showing necessary to carry the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction ....\
  • “Conclusory statements . . . [do] not constitute the prima facie showing necessary to carry the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Sentelle, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.