Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a denial of discovery when \the pleadings contained no allegations of specific facts that could establish the requisite contacts with the District\
• Washington office directly monitored legislative and regulatory matters and maintained contacts with Congress and the executive branch
• upholding dismissal under Rule 19(b) where defendants, over whom court lacked personal jurisdiction, had proprietary interest in lease which Naartex sought to cancel and alternative forum was available
• relying on an “uncontradicted affidavit” to conclude that the plaintiff failed to establish personal jurisdiction
• finding no abuse of discretion where the district court denied transfer “[i]n light of the substantive problems with [the] asserted claims”
• relying on an “uncontradicted affidavit” to conclude that the plaintiff failed to establish personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).